The Flesh of Swine

“I made myself accessible to those who didn’t ask for me, I let myself be found by …a nation not called by my name. I spread out my hands all day long to a rebellious people… who follow their own inclinations; a people who provoke me to my face all the time…they eat pig meat and their pots hold soup made from disgusting things” (Isaiah 65:1-4).

It’s not what goes into a man that makes him unclean, it’s what comes out.  Jesus made all foods clean in Mark 7.  Read Acts chapter 10 if you don’t believe me.  Peter ate with gentiles so he had to have eaten pork.  What about the Council of Jerusalem?  There were only four requirements for gentiles.   The broken record continues to skip, skip, skip.

Mark 7

“The Pharisees and some of the teachers of law Torah who had come from Jerusalem gathered around Yeshua and saw some of his disciples eating food with ‘unclean‘ – that is, ceremonially unwashed- hands” (verse 1).

Notice two things.  First, the disciples were eating food.  The word ‘food’ in verse 1 is the Greek word artos and means ‘bread.’  The disciples were eating bread. Second, they had not washed their hands.

“The Pharisees and all the Jews do not eat unless they give their hands a ceremonial washing, holding to the tradition of the elders” (verse 2).

Verse 2 specifically states that hand washing was a prerequisite to eating food, in this case bread.  Handwashing was a tradition and it even involved a certain way to wash the hands.

“When they come from the marketplace they do not eat unless they wash.  And they observe many other traditions, such as the washing of cups, pitchers and kettles” (verse 3).

Verse 3 explains the tradition was not just about hand washing, but about everything they used.  The traditions of the elders made cooking and eating a burden because of all the rules.

“So the Pharisees and teachers of the Torah asked Yeshua, ‘Why don’t your disciples live according to the tradition of the elders instead of eating their food with ‘unclean‘ hands?” (verse 4).

The question asked in Verse 4 is not about what the disciples were eating, but why they were not following the tradition of the elders in regards to hand washing. The disciples were eating with ‘unclean‘ or unwashed hands.

“Yeshua replied, ‘Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrits; as it is written” ‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me.  They worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men.  You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men.‘  …And he said to them, ‘You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions” (verses 6-8).

At this point, there is no further mention of food artos – clean or unclean.  The issue being disputed is the traditions or manmade laws that nullify the commandments of God, specifically hand washing.   

Yeshua continues to give other examples where the Pharisees and teachers of Torah  “nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down” (verse 13).

“Again Yeshua called the crowd to him and said, ‘Listen to me, everyone, and understand this.  Nothing outside a man can make him ‘unclean’ by going into him.  Rather, it is what comes out of a man that makes him ‘unclean” (verse 14).

In Verse 14, Yeshua never mentions food (bread).    He says that nothing outside a man can make him ‘unclean’ referring to something greater within the tradition of hand washing.

“After he had left the crowd and entered the house, the disciples asked him about this parable.  ‘Are you so dull?’ he asked.  ‘Don’t you see that nothing that enters a man from the outside can make him ‘unclean’?  For it doesn’t go into his heart, but into his stomach, and then out of his body (into the latrine)” (verses 17-19).

Yeshua does not mention food at all when he explains the parable to his disciples.   He says that ‘no thing’ that enters a man from outside can make him ‘unclean’.   Consider for a moment the issue being discussed: the ceremonial hand washing.  Yeshua’s disciples had come from the marketplace or a grain field or even the Sea of Galilee.  Their hands were dirty and they were eating bread (artos).  This offended those leaders who held to the tradition of the elders in regards to hand washing.  According to the tradition, no one is supposed to eat food, in this case bread, with dirty hands.  Yeshua tells his disciples that dirty hands don’t make a man dirty or unclean in his heart.   The dirt that may enter his mouth on the food (bread) will go through his body and out into the toilet.

The next verse is the one that causes all the confusion. “In saying this, Yeshua declared all foods clean” (verse 19).  In some versions of the Bible there is a footnote clarifying this parenthetical statement was added later by translators.  This means that some translator was injecting their opinion rather than taking the Scriptural events at face value.

However, on some level what the translator wrote is true.  Everything created by God for food is clean.  However, the specific food spoken about his this passage,  artos or bread, has always been, and always will be clean.  Some Bible versions of Mark 7 have translated artos as ‘meat’ taking this discourse into a very different direction than what Yeshua meant and his disciples understood.

What God Considers Food

Leviticus 11:1-23 outlines what God considers food for those who put their faith in His Son Yeshua and enter into a new covenant relationship with Him inclusive of obeying the commandments. 

“The LORD said to Moses and Aaron, “Say to the Israelites: ‘Of all the animals that live on land, these are the ones you may eat: You may eat any animal that has a divided hoof and that chews the cud.  “‘There are some that only chew the cud or only have a divided hoof, but you must not eat them. The camel, though it chews the cud, does not have a divided hoof; it is ceremonially unclean for you.  The hyrax, though it chews the cud, does not have a divided hoof; it is unclean for you. The rabbit, though it chews the cud, does not have a divided hoof; it is unclean for you. And the pig, though it has a divided hoof, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you. You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you.”

“‘Of all the creatures living in the water of the seas and the streams you may eat any that have fins and scales.  But all creatures in the seas or streams that do not have fins and scales—whether among all the swarming things or among all the other living creatures in the water—you are to regard as unclean.  And since you are to regard them as unclean, you must not eat their meat; you must regard their carcasses as unclean.  Anything living in the water that does not have fins and scales is to be regarded as unclean by you.

“‘These are the birds you are to regard as unclean and not eat because they are unclean: the eagle,  the vulture, the black vulture, the red kite, any kind of black kite,  any kind of raven, the horned owl, the screech owl, the gull, any kind of hawk, the little owl, the cormorant, the great owl,  the white owl, the desert owl, the osprey, the stork, any kind of heron, the hoopoe and the bat.

“‘All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be regarded as unclean by you. There are, however, some flying insects that walk on all fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground. Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket or grasshopper. But all other flying insects that have four legs you are to regard as unclean.”

It is interesting to note that there are more animals mentioned in Leviticus than just the pig.  There is the rabbit, the camel, and the hyrax.  There are creatures in the ocean without both fins and scales that are not considered food.  Birds such as vultures, ravens, hawks and owls are not considered food.  Insects that walk on all fours are also not considered food.  Verse 11 clearly states that ‘unclean’ means ‘not food’: “And since you are to regard them as unclean, you must not eat their meat.”

Noah Ate Everything, Right?

Noah lived before God gave dietary instructions to the Israelites.  During his lifetime and before the flood,  people ate only what they produced from the earth.   According to the book of Enoch, the Nephilim ate everything:  every animal, bird, creature,  and they even drank the blood of men.  They devoured the earth and defiled humanity.  God not only saw the lawlessness of the Nephilim, but also every evil inclination in the heart of mankind.  He decided to wipe the human race from the earth and with them, the animals, the birds and creatures that move along the ground (Genesis 6:5-7).

Noah built an ark.  Noah was told to take with him into the ark ‘seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and one pair of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, and also seven pairs of every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive throughout the earth” (Genesis 7:2-3).

“Pairs of clean and unclean animals, of birds and of all creatures that move along the ground, male and female, came to Noah and entered the ark, as God had commanded Noah” (Genesis 7:8).

Two times it is mentioned that Noah took ‘clean and unclean animals’ with him on the ark.  Because Noah had never eaten the meat of animals, he  probably did not know the difference between clean and unclean so God brought the animals to him. From what he was shown in pairs of two or seven pairs of two, he learned and understood the difference immediately.

After the flood Noah worshipped the Lord by offering a sacrifice.

“Then Noah built an altar to the LORD and, taking some of all the clean animals and clean birds, he sacrificed burnt offerings on it.  The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: “Never again will I curse the ground because of humans, even though every inclination of the human heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done” (Genesis 8:19-21).

“Then God blessed Noah and his sons, saying to them, ‘Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the earth. The fear and dread of you will fall on all the beasts of the earth, and on all the birds in the sky, on every creature that moves along the ground, and on all the fish in the sea; they are given into your hands.  Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you.  Just as I gave you green plants, I now give you everything” (Genesis 9:3).

It would seem that now Noah could eat of every animal that came with him on the ark because ‘everything that lives and moves about will be food for you.’ However, if he ate one of the pigs or rabbits or hawks, they would have immediately become extinct since there were only one male and one female of every unclean animal.

Consider also that though Noah had eaten ‘all green plants,’  he probably didn’t eat poisonous mushrooms or poison ivy or the green leaves of rhubarb.   Just as some plants were not edible or created as food, some animals had purposes other than food.  The camel is a beast of burden as is a horse.  A hawk cleans up dead animals on the earth while shrimp and crabs clean up the dead, decaying creatures on the sea bottom.  God saying that just as Noah had green plants so he has animals is not all inclusive given the information God had revealed to him regarding the number of animals brought onto the Ark and the command to multiply on the earth.

Part of the sacrificial/offering system that was eventually established by God had to do with feeding the Levitical priesthood.  They had no land of their own, no livestock, no farms.  They were fed from the sacrificed animals –  all of which were clean animals or animals that God created for food.   It  is the same for Noah.  He did not sacrifice and eat unclean animals; he sacrificed and ate the clean ones which had been given to him as food.   From the animals that  entered the Ark, he understood what God considered meat as food and what He did not. 

Making all foods clean was not the purpose of Noah’s deliverance from the polluted world of the Nephilim nor was it the message of  the Prophets (Moses), the Gospel preached by Yeshua or the Apostles. It was not the purpose of Peter’s vision nor the conclusion of the Council of Jerusalem.

What ABOUT Peter’s vision?

“About noon the following day as they were on their journey and approaching the city, Peter went up on the roof to pray.  He became hungry and wanted something to eat, and while the meal was being prepared, he fell into a trance. He saw heaven opened and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners.  It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles and birds. Then a voice told him, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.”

“Surely not, Lord!” Peter replied. “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.”

The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”

This happened three times, and immediately the sheet was taken back to heaven.

While Peter was wondering about the meaning of the vision, the men sent by Cornelius found out where Simon’s house was and stopped at the gate. They called out, asking if Simon who was known as Peter was staying there.

While Peter was still thinking about the vision, the Spirit said to him, “Simon, three men are looking for you. So get up and go downstairs. Do not hesitate to go with them, for I have sent them.”

Peter went down and said to the men, “I’m the one you’re looking for. Why have you come?” (Acts 10:9-21).

This Biblical account is about a vision, a trance, not an actual event.  Just as Joseph’s dreams didn’t literally come true, but had spiritual meaning, so does Peter’s vision.

Peter went to the roof to pray.  He was hungry and had a vision of a sheet filled with all kinds of unclean animals.  (In the KJV, this sheet was bound at the four corners suggesting that it was a talit or prayer shawl which adds another dimension to the ‘sheet’.)

When God tells Peter to ‘get up, kill and eat’, Peter’s first response is, “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.”

Peter’s first response is refusing to eat  animals that are not considered food. This seems like a strange response from one of Yeshua’s disciples.  Peter would have been with Yeshua when he ‘made all foods clean‘ in Mark 7 if, in fact, that is what Yeshua actually did.  Of course, after reading Mark 7, it is pretty clear that Yeshua was not talking about clean and unclean foods, but the tradition of ceremonial hand washing.   If Yeshua had during his lifetime made all foods (meats, included) clean,  Peter, of all his disciples, would have known and would have had a different reaction to the voice of God.   If Yeshua had, after his resurrection, made all foods clean (and there are no Scriptures to support this idea), Peter, of all the Apostles, surely would have known and had a different first response.

God speaks to Peter a second time because Peter is not understanding the vision.   Even after the second time, he doesn’t understand and God speaks to him a third time.  It is interesting that many well-meaning, but untaught Christians immediately conclude that this vision was about eating everything as food; however Peter, who experienced the vision, was still wondering about its meaning even after being told THREE TIMES!  While Peter is still thinking about the vision, some men come to visit him.

A tradition at this time was that a Jewish person would not step foot in a gentile’s home. This was an  understood tradition and one that Yeshua himself honored. He never went into a gentile’s home. NEVER. The Centurion in Matthew 8 understood this and told Yeshua he did not need to come to his home.  He knew Yeshua was a man of authority and that whatever Yeshua said would be done.  Yeshua commended him for having greater faith than those in Israel.

There was also the Canaanite woman in Matthew 15 who had a demon-possessed daughter.   She asked Yeshua for help and was told it was not right to take food from children and give it to the dogs.  Her response was that even the dogs eat the crumbs from under their owner’s table.  She, too, was commended for her great faith.

It isn’t until the following day at the house of a gentile man, a Roman centurion named Cornelius, that Peter begins to understand the vision.  Cornelius wasn’t just any gentile.  He was God-fearing and righteous. He was respected by all the Jewish people with whom he came in contact.   Peter is finally able to  interpret the vision.   In the presence of Cornelius, he understands the message of Yeshua, the message of salvation was to go to the nations which were represented by the four-footed unclean animals.

“Then Peter began to speak: “I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears him and does what is right” (Acts 10:34).

Notice what Peter states: God accepts people from every nation who not only FEAR Him, but DO what is right.  What does this mean?  To be a God-fearing gentile meant to ‘obey God’s commandments.’  To be ‘righteous’ means to ‘live rightly before God’. 

Cornelius was a God-fearing and righteous gentile.  From his interactions and relationships with the Jewish people around him, he already understood what was food and what was not food.  Cornelius’s eating habits were probably similar to those of the Jews who respected him and considered him righteous!   No one in Cornelius’ house ever mentioned food and eating pig or shrimp because food was never the purpose of Peter’s vision.  It was about going to the gentiles and entering their homes with the message of Yeshua.    By putting their faith in the Jewish Messiah, Cornelius and his family became filled with the Holy Spirit and were immersed in water.  Soon after this, the word spread throughout Judea that the gentiles were receiving the Word of God not having pork roasts. 

Let’s suppose for a minute that Cornelius did eat unclean foods as many Christians believe.  Would not  is new-found faith in the Messiah of Israel along with the righteous condition of his heart give him the desire to learn the Scriptures and obey God’s commandments?  Would not Peter have taught him God’s ordinances or even more so, the Spirit of God by writing them on Cornelius’ heart?  Being a gentile was never an excuse for disobedience after receiving the Spirit of God and being immersed.

Peter went up to Jerusalem and was criticized for entering the homes of gentiles and eating with them.  Again, it wasn’t about WHAT Peter was eating, but WHO he was eating with.  Table fellowship bound people together and the leaders in Jerusalem were worried that the Scriptures were going to become watered down if Peter fellowshipped with gentile believers.  Peter had to explain that the gentiles were coming to faith in Messiah and living lives of repentance.  Repentance means turning back to the ways of God which would include obeying the dietary commandments in the Scriptures.

“Starting from the beginning, Peter told them the whole story …” (Acts 11:4).  When they heard the conclusion that God had baptized the gentiles with the Holy Spirit, they had no further objections.

“When they heard this, they had no further objections and praised God saying, “So then, even to Gentiles God has granted repentance that leads to life” (Acts 11:18).

It is a serious distortion of Scripture to think that Peter, a faithful Messianic Jew, would suddenly eat animals that were not created to be food in order to win gentiles to faith in Messiah.  In reality, it was the gentiles who were coming to faith in the Jewish Messiah that were challenged to leave behind their pagan, unBiblical practices and live according to the commandments of God.  No one ever mentioned from the first moment of Peter’s vision through its interpretation in Jerusalem that suddenly it was acceptable to eat all animals – clean or unclean.  Instead, they were rejoicing that the gentles were being saved.

For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit” (Romans 14:17).

Council of Jerusalem

Some time after Paul began his ministry to gentiles, certain people came from Judea to Antioch and were teaching believers that unless they were circumcised they could not be saved.  This caused dissension within the Body, and between Paul and Barnabas.  They decided to go to Jerusalem to see the apostles and elders about the matter.

The apostles and elders considered the question and resolved that  gentiles did not have to be circumcised in the flesh in order to be saved.  (This means that gentiles did not have to convert to Judaism through a ritual conversion of circumcision, but could remain as gentiles.)   Because the elders heard that God was purifying the gentiles’ hearts and anointing them with the Holy Spirit, they concluded that justification is by faith in Messiah alone.  They created a ‘judicial statement’ and decided they should not make it difficult for gentiles who are turning to God.   They came up with four beginning requirements.

“Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood” (Acts 15:20).

These four requirements were given to gentiles coming from a  pagan culture who were turning to God through repentance.  Each of these requirements were part of pagan ritual worship and had to be removed from their lives in order not to pollute the growing Body of Messiah with the ways of the nations.    This was to be the beginning of their turning to God NOT the ONLY things they ever had to do in their walk of faith.   In fact, these four requirements encompass nearly all the Torah commands given to Israel: dietary laws, sacrificial laws, sexual morality/immorality laws, and idolatry.

The next verse is rarely quoted with the four requirements, but is just as important, if not crucial, to the growth of every new believer then, as well as now.

“For the Torah of Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath” (Acts 15:21).

This final statement embodies the life of every believer whether Jew (circumcised) or non-Jew (uncircumcised).  Born again non-Jews who were turning to God attended synagogues  every Sabbath, not churches.   They were hearing the teachings and instructions given to Moses and were being convicted, challenged, and transformed through their new circumcised hearts.   It was this joining of ‘circumcised’ and ‘uncircumcised’ believers in the synagogues that testified to the ‘one new man’ in Messiah.

Unlike today, for the first 30 years of the Messianic community, all gentile believers were being instructed in the first five books of the Bible.   They did not  have Acts chapter 10.  They did not have a New Testament from which to learn about God.  They only had the the Torah with which to learn the commandments.  They only had the Prophets and Writings to understand their new covenant Messianic faith.

At the Council of Jerusalem, there was nothing mentioned about foods and dietary changes based on what was happening with the gentiles coming to faith.   No one suggested or argued that eating pork, camel or dog was now acceptable because “Jesus had died on the cross.”   In fact, quite the opposite was true.  Sacrificing and eating unclean animals along with idol worship was not to be among the gentiles who were turning to God through repentance.  New believers from the nations obeyed these requirements because Yeshua’s death and resurrection had brought them into the Kingdom of God and had given them a new life. 

The Real Problem with ‘Porky the Pig’

Did you know that Jewish people who were forced to convert to a new religion called Christianity (via Roman catholicism) were called maranos?   This word in Spanish means ‘damned, accursed, banned   and HOG’.   It was applied to Spanish/Portuguese Jews when they succumbed to eating the flesh of swine in order to save their lives.

Pig in the form of  pork, sausage or bacon has been used throughout Christian history to force Jewish people to convert to Christianity on pain of death.  Jewish people converted to this foreign religion with a trinity of gods to avoid cruel and inhumane persecutions based solely on the fact that they obeyed Yahweh’s commandments: did not eat pig, circumcised their sons, and kept the Sabbath along with the  Feasts of the LORD.  They were forced with threat of death to disobey God’s commands in order to reside within the Christian community as a marano ‘pig’ convert.

The whole issue of eating pork, the flesh of swine,  has been and continues to be used by the enemy to keep Jewish people from truly knowing the love of God through their own Messiah.  It is used (and eaten) most explicitly by people who say they know and love Jesus Christ!  This is unfortunate because Jewish people are looking for a Messiah who will teach the Torah in proper perspective as Yeshua did.  They do not recognize a pork eating, Sabbath breaking Christian Jesus as their deliverer and they never will.

Millennial Kingdom

“Those who consecrate and purify themselves to go into the gardens behind one of their temples and eat the flesh of pigs, rats and other unclean things – they will meet their end together with the one they follow,’ declares YHVH” (Isaiah 66:17).

This Scripture from Isaiah is about the time before the new heavens and earth during the Millennial Kingdom when Yeshua will judge the nations.  One of the judgments is against those who eat the ‘flesh of swine’ behind their temples.

Pig roasts have become more and more prevalent in church celebrations today as Christians fight for and defend  (almost to their own death) the eating of the flesh of swine.  Bacon has become an almost revered food and flavor.  If  eating pig was no longer considered something ‘unclean’ in the eyes of God, then Isaiah would not have prophesied that those who eat this meat behind their ‘temples’ will meet their end with the one they follow.

Choose this Day Who You Serve

Yeshua did not make all bread clean for he did not have to.  It was already a clean food and always will be.  Noah understood the difference between which animals were considered food and which were not based on the number of pairs of animals God brought to the Ark.   God’s dietary outline for Israel had no mention of health or undercooked meats.  The only requirement was their faith expressed through obedience.  Peter’s vision had nothing to do with removing unclean foods from a god-fearer’s diet,  but was revelation that the promise to Abraham was being fulfilled – the good news of  salvation was going to the nations.  The Council of Jerusalem laid the foundation for gentiles who were coming to faith in Yeshua which  included obeying the Torah commands about idolatry, sexual immorality and food.    Finally, Isaiah prophesied what will happen to those in the future who rebel against God and His commands by eating pig meat, the flesh of swine.   They will meet their end with the one they follow who cannot be the Messiah of Israel.    

As Joshua told the Israelites, “Now fear the Lord and serve him with all faithfulness. Throw away the gods your ancestors worshiped beyond the Euphrates River and in Egypt, and serve the LORD. But if serving the LORD seems undesirable to you, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your ancestors served beyond the Euphrates, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you are living. But as for me and my household, we will serve the LORD” (Joshua 24:15).

© August 2010 Tent Stake Ministries (For hard copy and more teachings like this one, read Journey with Jeremiah: Nourishment for the Wild Olive.)

2 Responses to “The Flesh of Swine”

  • Chris says:

    So, despite having walked for 40 years with my most wonderful and glorious Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ of Nazareth, because I eat the flesh of pigs I will be anathema to God. So much then for Jesus’ sacrifice being sufficient!

    • Yahulia says:

      I have walked with my most wonderful and glorious Savior for that long as well. It’s tough when we learn that Jesus didn’t die to redeem animals, but only to save us from our disobedience called sin (1 John 3:4). We all tend to believe that ‘food’ is unimportant, but Adam and Eve faced the same decision. It cost all of us Paradise.

      Grace was never meant to give us freedom to do what we please, but to empower us to live and know our God and Savior more deeply. It’s tough to realize that God does have standards, teachings and instructions for people who enter His Kingdom when we have been taught so differently. 

He sent His Son to us to show us how to live out those standards – with love for our Father and love for others. He then allowed Him to be crucified and die because we sinned; we broke the very commandments he did not including eating pork. He rose from the dead to bring us hope of our own ultimate restoration. He went into the heavenlies and asked his Father to send us His Spirit of Truth (John 14:15). This Spirit would not only empower us to be witnesses to the the world of God’s grace and mercy, but also His justice to those who disobey – whether or not we ‘know Jesus’. Remember, Jesus comes with rewards to those who are saved and obedient (Revelation 22:12).

      If you read the article, which I am assuming you did, there are judgements to come regarding the eating of unclean animals and those who eat them behind their ‘temples’. This isn’t my judgement as I am only called to give warning. Giving up something we love like a food or another sin is difficult because sin comes ultimately from being deceived, but giving up sin and its enticements is part of ‘offering ourselves as a living sacrifice’ (Romans 12:1). It is also a way to witness to Jesus’ Jewish brothers and sisters who do not eat unclean foods. We have had more opportunities to share Jesus of Nazareth with Jewish people because they are not looking for a Messiah who breaks God’s commandments nor teaches others to do so. Even in Matthew 5:17-20 there will be the least and greatest in the Kingdom based on whether or not they teach the commandments of God. Unbelievers, too, are looking for that righteous standard in the lives of those who say they follow Christ. Recently I had a Wiccan tell me that she has no respect for Christians who are against same-sex marriage when they don’t keep the Sabbath and eat pork. She said that it sickens her that they pick and choose what they want to stand for rather than stand for the whole Word of God. That’s a WICCAN! If we want to be a Light to this dying world, our testimony has to be solid built on the foundation of the apostles AND the prophets, not just on the cornerstone (Ephesians 2).

      It’s unfortunate that food has even become an issue within the Body of Christ when Scripture says that ‘it’s not about what we eat and drink, but about righteousness, peace and joy in the Spirit’ (Romans 14:17). We have the Spirit; we need to live righteously (a great word study if you have a Bible study group). Please remember from the article that the issue with pig is bigger than food, it’s an anti-semitic symbol to make the Jewish people an anethma to God.

      We all have a choice to make in this life – to continue to eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil or the Tree of Life. The fruit from the Tree of Life never allows us to disobey God and dishonor the work of His Son now or eternally. What it does do is add to our faith challenging us exercise it so that our faith does not appear dead (1 Peter 1:5, James 2:17).

      Thank you for your comment. I appreciate you taking the time to wonder. You will never be an anethma to God, but you may lose a precious reward (Revelation 19:6-8).

Leave a Reply

*